NNR Artificial Intelligence Model in Azure for Bearing Prediction and Analysis
by Henry Ogbemudia Omoregbee 1,* 
, Mabel Usunobun Olanipekun 2 , Bright Aghogho Edward 3
1 University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lagos, 101017, Nigeria
2 Tshwane University of Technology, Department of Computer Systems Engineering, Soshanguve Campus, 0183, South Africa
3 Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Effurun, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Effurun, 330102, Nigeria
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 6, Page # 1-9, 2023; DOI: 10.55708/js0206001
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence Model, Forecasting, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning, Neural Network regression (NNR), Remaining Useful Life (RUL), Multilayer perceptron (MLP)
Received: 28 January 2023, Revised: 06 March 2023, Accepted: 15 April 2023, Published Online: 30 June 2023
APA Style
Omoregbee, H. O., Olanipekun, M. U., & Edward, B. A. (2023). NNR Artificial Intelligence Model in Azure for Bearing Prediction and Analysis. Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences, 2(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55708/js0206001
Chicago/Turabian Style
Omoregbee, Henry Ogbemudia, Mabel Usunobun Olanipekun, and Bright Aghogho Edward. “NNR Artificial Intelligence Model in Azure for Bearing Prediction and Analysis.” Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences 2, no. 6 (June 1, 2023): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55708/js0206001.
IEEE Style
H. O. Omoregbee, M. U. Olanipekun, and B. A. Edward, “NNR Artificial Intelligence Model in Azure for Bearing Prediction and Analysis,” Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1–9, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.55708/js0206001.
Neural Network regression (NNR) is considered more effective as compared to multiple neural networks model readily available in Azure to evaluate the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of bearing in this work because it performs better than other models when used and was demonstrated as a non-programing technique for analyzing enormous data without the use of Hive, Hadoop, Pig, etc. To complement the earlier paper, we further used statistical means in verifying our results. Using this non-parametric non-linear approach is intuitively appealing to forecast the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a bearing. Over the years the Azure cloud service platform has gained recognition as a major forecasting technique toolbox of forecasters, NNR model implementations have surged, hence its inclusion here on its’ use on the NASA FEMTO-ST Institute (Franche-Comté ÉlectroniqueMécaniqueThermique et Optique – Sciences et Technologies) bearing dataset. Azure is a machine learning platform from Microsoft that allows developers to write, test, and deploy algorithms and has been motivationally proven adequate and useful for predicting the RUL of bearings. As seen in so many recent articles, NNR Artificial Intelligence is a model among many others readily available for computing on the platform that has been successfully used for non-programming of the enormous dataset and applied for forecasting the RUL of Bearing. This has added value in the forecasting phase. The novelty in this work is related to the application of NNR where we were able to combine the Dickey-Fuller Test with NNR to ensure that the data needed to be used with NNR is fit for application to yield optimal prediction results and our previous result from the past paper was further established. A satisfactory judgmental result was obtained; making Azure’s work studio a reasonable place to predict without much programming expertise. We tested the findings from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) database for the person that came first in the competition by comparing our Azure model observations with the NNR observations collected. Ultimately, we showed the finding is enhanced by the AZURE model.
- H.O. Omoregbee; M.U. Olanipekun and B.A. Edward, “Non-Coding of Big Dataset and the use of Neural Network Regression Artificial Intelligence Model in Azure for Predicting the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of Bearing,” IEEE AFRICON 2019, 1 – 7, 2019, doi: 10.1109/AFRICON46755.2019.9133738
- G. Arminger and D. Enache “Statistical Models and Artificial Neural Networks,” In: Bock HH., Polasek W. (eds) Data Analysis and Information Systems. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1996, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80098-6_21
- B. Li, M-Y., Chow, Y. Tipsuwan and J.C. Hung, “Neural-network-based motor rolling bearing fault diagnosis,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 47(5), pp. 1060–1069. 2000, doi: 10.1109/41.873214
- M. Chiarandini “Machine Learning : Linear Regression and Neural Networks,” in Introduction to Computer Science, Department of Mathematics & Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark.2017.
- S. Bradley Russell, “A Comparison of Neural Network and Regression Models for Navy Retention Modeling,” Masters’ Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943-5002.
- A.K.B. Mahamad, “Diagnosis, Classification and Prognosis of Rotating Machine using Artificial Intelligence,” Kumamoto University Japan 2010.
- R. G. Ahangar, “The Comparison of Methods Artificial Neural Network with Linear Regression Using Specific Variables for Prediction Stock Price in Tehran Stock Exchange,” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 7(2), pp. 38–46, 2010, http://sites.google.com/sites/ijcsis/ ISSN: 1947 5500
- K.A. Tsakiri and S. K. Marsellos, “Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Linear New York,” Molecular Diversity Preservation International, 10(1158), 2018, doi: 10.3390/w10091158.
- O.S Maliki, A.O Agbo, A.O. Maliki, L.M Ibeh and C.O Agwu. “Comparison of Regression Model and Artificial Neural Network Model for the prediction of Electrical Power generated in Nigeria,” Pelagia Research Library, 2(5), pp. 329–339, 2011, www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com ISSN: 0976-8610.
- Z. Derouiche, M. Boukhobza, B. Belmekki and J.M. Rouvaen “Application of neural networks for monitoring mechanical defects of rotating machines,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON’10), Cairo University, Egypt, December 19-21, 2010, Paper ID 161.
- H.O. Omoregbee (2018), Diagnosis and prognosis of rolling element bearings at low speeds and varying load conditions using higher-order statistics and artificial intelligence, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of Pretoria. South Africa.
- D. An, J-H. Choi and N.H. Kim, “Remaining useful life prediction of rolling element bearings using degradation feature based on amplitude decrease at specific frequencies,” Structural Health Monitoring, 1–15, 2017, doi.org/10.1177/1475921717736226
- W. Caesarendra, P.B. Kosasih, K. Tieu and Q. Zhu, “Acoustic emission-based condition monitoring methods: Review and application for low-speed slew bearing,” Mechanical Systems, and Signal Processing, 72-73, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.10.020
- K.A. Tsakiri and S. K. Marsellos, “Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Linear New York,” Molecular Diversity Preservation International, 10(1158), 2018, doi: 10.3390/w10091158.
- C.L. Dunis, and J. Jalilov, (2002) “Neural Network Regression and Alternative Forecasting Techniques for Predicting Financial Variables by,” Neural network world, pp. 1–30. doi=10.1.1.335.7373&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
- C-M. Lin, A-B.Ting, M-C.Li and T-Y. Chen, “Neural-network-based robust adaptive control for a class of non-linear systems,” Neural Comput&Applic, 20, pp. 557–563, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s00521-011-0561-2.
- N. Zerhouni, C. Varnier, and P. An, “IEEE PHM 2012 Data challenge IEEE PHM 2012 Prognostic challenge Outline,” Experiment, Scoring of results, Winners (2012).
