Because firms are considering the influence of their operations on the environment, the green supply chain has become a crucial indication of corporate performance. The issues here necessitate both competent management and a fresh, innovative strategy for cost reduction, productivity enhancement, and natural resource protection. We shall try to understand the Barriers of Green Supply Chain Management concept in this report. A total of 47 obstacles were discovered after a thorough review of the literature. Priority ranking stability is investigated via a sensitivity analysis. Using existing models have mostly focused on identifying these constraints.

1. T, Rahman et al,, “Evaluating barriers to implementing green supply chain management: An example from an emerging economy”, Production Planning & Control, vol, 0, no, 0, pp, 1–26, 2019, doi:10,1080/09537287,2019,1674939,
2. H, Fahmy et al,, “Barries of the GSCM Implementation: A benchmark of studies of AHP and ISM”, 2020 13th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, LOGISTIQUA 2020, pp, 1–8, 2020, doi:10,1109/LOGISTIQUA49782,2020,9353902,
3. P, Government, M, Perron, “Barriers to Environmental Performance Improvements in Canadian SMEs Barriers to Environmental Performance Improvements in Canadian SMEs by Geneviève M , Perron Interdisciplinary PhD Student Dalhousie University”no, January, 2005,
4. K, Govindan, Mathiyazhagan, A, Noorul Haq, “Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy proce”, International Journal of Production Research, vol, 52, no, 1, pp, 188–202, 2014, doi:10,1080/00207543,2013,831190,
5. C, R, Carter, M, Dresner, “Purchasing ’ s role in environmental management : cross-functional”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol, 37, no, 3, pp, 12–27, 2001, doi:10,1111/j,1745-493X,2001,tb00102,x,
6. H, Walker, L, Di Sisto, D, McBain, “Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol, 14, no, 1, pp, 69–85, 2008, doi:10,1016/j,pursup,2008,01,007,
7. S, Luthra et al,, “Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique-an Indian perspective”, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol, 4, no, 2, pp, 231–257, 2011, doi:10,3926/jiem,2011,v4n2,p231-257,
8. B, Sharma, M, Singh, Neha, “Modeling the Knowledge Sharing Barriers using an ISM approach,”, International Proceedings of Computer Science & Information, vol, 45, no, ICIKM, pp, 233–238, 2012,
9. W, Niemann, T, Kotze, F, Adamo, “Drivers and barriers of green supply chain management implementation in the Mozambican manufacturing industry”, Journal of Contemporary Management, vol, 13, no, 13, pp, 977–1013, 2016,
10. K, T, Shibin et al,, “Enablers and Barriers of Flexible Green Supply Chain Management: A Total Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach”, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, vol, 17, no, 2, pp, 171–188, 2016, doi:10,1007/s40171-015-0109-x,
11. H, Soleimani et al,, “Fuzzy multi-objective sustainable and green closed-loop supply chain network design”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol, 109, pp, 191–203, 2017, doi:10,1016/j,cie,2017,04,038,
12. R, Baki, “Literature Review on Green Supply Chain Management Concept and Problems During It’s Implementation”, The Journal of International Scientific Researches, vol, 3, no, 2, pp, 17–25, 2018, doi:10,23834/isrjournal,412121,
13. A, Majumdar, S, K, Sinha, “Analyzing the barriers of green textile supply chain management in Southeast Asia using interpretive structural modeling”, Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol, 17, pp, 176–187, 2019, doi:10,1016/j,spc,2018,10,005,
14. K, Govindan et al,, “Barriers analysis for Green Supply Chain Management implementation in Indian Industries Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Int , J , Production Economics Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic ”, Intern, Journal of Production Economics, vol, 147, no, September 2013, pp, 555–568, 2018, doi:10,1016/j,ijpe,2013,08,018,
15. J, N, Warfield, “Developing Interconnection Matrices in Structural Modeling”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol, SMC-4, no, 1, pp, 81–87, 1974, doi:10,1109/TSMC,1974,5408524,
16. A, P, Sage, T, J, Smith, “On group assessment of utility and worth attributes using interpretive structural modeling”, Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol, 4, no, 3, pp, 185–198, 1977, doi:10,1016/0045-7906(77)90029-5,
17. V, Raci, R, Shankar, “Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol, 72, no, 8, pp, 1011–1029, 2005, doi:10,1016/j,techfore,2004,07,002,
18. T, L, Saaty, “WHAT IS THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS ?”1988,
19. K, Mathiyazhagan et al,, “Application of analytical hierarchy process to evaluate pressures to implement green supply chain management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol, 107, pp, 229–236, 2015, doi:10,1016/j,jclepro,2015,04,110,
20. C.C. Pradeep, “Assessment and analysis of GSCM barriers using AHP”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology(IRJET), vol, 4, no, 6, pp, 1777–1782, 2017,
21. C, W, Hsu et al,, “Green supply chain management in the electronic industry”vol, 5, no, 2, pp, 205–216, 2008,
22. S. Singh, “Vol , 03 Issue – 03 , ( March 2015 ) ISSN : 2321 – 1776 International Journal in IT and Engineering”vol, 03, no, March, pp, 279–287, 2015,

Citations by Dimensions

Citations by PlumX

Crossref Citations

This paper is currently not cited.

No. of Downloads per Month

No. of Downloads per Country